Home Three-Gate Framework
The Three-Gate Framework

Three gates. Every deal. No exceptions.

Every acquisition must clear all three filters before a dollar is committed. The framework is adversarial by design — each gate is a reason to walk away, not a box to tick. A failure at any gate ends the evaluation, regardless of how attractive the other two look.

Request Fund Materials Read the Framework →
Gates Three
Pass Requirement All Three
Stance Adversarial
NOI Source Actuals, Not OM
Failure Mode Documented & Set Aside
Output Risk-Flagged IC Memo
The Acquisition Filter

The Gates, In Detail

Each gate tests a different failure mode. Market Quality asks whether demand is real. Operational Gap asks whether underperformance is fixable by us. Experience Asset Quality asks whether the building is worth the work. A deal must survive all three.

01

Market Quality

The first gate tests demand, not the asset. We are underwriting the market before we underwrite the building: if the submarket cannot support durable rate growth, no amount of operational skill will manufacture it. Supply pipeline is weighted as heavily as current performance — a strong RevPAR today means little against three branded openings in twenty-four months.

What must be true
  • RevPAR above $120
  • Occupancy trend positive over trailing 3 years
  • ADR growth outpacing CPI
  • Limited new branded supply in the pipeline
  • Proximity to durable demand generators
What disqualifies
  • Single-employer or single-event demand base
  • New supply exceeding 10% of existing keys
  • RevPAR growth driven by one non-repeating year
02

Operational Gap

The second gate tests whether underperformance is our thesis or the market's verdict. We are looking for a measurable delta between current NOI and market-rate NOI that is attributable to management failure — a gap we can close by operating the asset ourselves. If the property underperforms because the market underperforms, there is nothing for us to fix.

What must be true
  • NOI at least 20% below market comp set
  • RevPAR Index below 85
  • Management contract terminable at or near closing
  • Deferred maintenance identified and addressable
  • Expense structure reconstructable from actuals
What disqualifies
  • Underperformance explained by market, not management
  • Management contract with long lock-in or heavy liquidated damages
  • Capital need exceeding the achievable NOI uplift
03

Experience Asset Quality

The third gate tests whether the building deserves the capital. Beco's operating standard amplifies narrative — architecture, provenance, location, design. It cannot manufacture it. A structurally sound asset with no story is a commodity hotel, and commodity hotels compete on price, which is the one game we do not intend to play.

What must be true
  • Unique physical structure, history, or provenance
  • Walkable or destination-adjacent location
  • Convertible to the brand standard within budget
  • Public spaces capable of carrying the experience
  • A reason for a guest to choose it over a flag
What disqualifies
  • Generic or fully commoditized product
  • Layout that blocks conversion to brand standard
  • Location dependent on a highway or parking field
Framework Design

Why Three Gates

01

They Are Sequential, Not Weighted

The gates are not a scorecard to be averaged. A deal cannot compensate for a failed gate by scoring well on the other two. Weighted models let an attractive story outvote a structural flaw — sequential gates do not.

02

They Test Different Failure Modes

Market, management, and asset are independent sources of loss. A framework that tests only one of them will systematically miss the other two, which is how most boutique acquisitions are underwritten and why so many of them disappoint.

03

They Force a Written No

Every deal that fails a gate is documented and set aside with the reason recorded. The discipline is not in finding deals — it is in being able to explain, later, exactly why we passed.

Sequence

How a Deal Moves Through

01

Gate One — Market

The submarket is tested first, before any property-level work. If the market fails, the evaluation ends here and no diligence spend is committed.

02

Gate Two — Operations

Financials are rebuilt from trailing actuals. Offering-memorandum NOI is discarded. The gap must be real, measurable, and attributable to management.

03

Gate Three — Asset

The building is assessed against the brand standard, including a conversion budget. Narrative is scored honestly, not generously.

04

Flag & Document

Risks are color-coded and surfaced prominently. Deal-breaker flags — lease line vs. fee simple, unresolved liabilities — block the deal until legally resolved.

05

Committee

A deal that clears all three gates advances to a full investment-committee memo: thesis, reconstructed model, brand-fit scorecard, and every open flag.

Investor Access

Request Fund Materials.

Fund I is open to accredited investors and qualified purchasers. Submit your information and the IR team will follow up within one business day with the Private Placement Memorandum and supplemental materials.

  • Private Placement Memorandum (PPM)
  • Financial Model & Underwriting Package
  • Property-Level Due Diligence Summaries
  • LP Subscription Documents
  • Investor Q&A Call Scheduling

Minimum investment: $250,000  ·  Accredited Investors only